MODEL PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT USAHA KECIL MENENGAH (UKM) DI KAWASAN EKS LOKALISASI DOLLY SURABAYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30649/aamama.v21i2.91Kata Kunci:
Empowerment, Institutional Community Ecology, Closured, LocalizationAbstrak
This research was intended to identify community empowerment program for the ex “Dolly” localization, Surabaya to the development of empowerment models which are effective for the affected communities of the localization. The closure of the localization of in surabaya (and some other cities) left behind problems on the affected communities (fuel price hike worried investors localization of extricating a person who begins) who termarginalyze from the economic life of cause have lost employment opportunities. Needed capable of bridge empowerment intermediate profession affected communities on a new job in normal life. Empowerment is the provision of capacity to target that can and able to solve the matter in more independent. Public empowerment be able run well and be more successful if the group seen as collective the community target. On that perspective be related to be concerned with community ecology context, where success empowerment also determinated by intervation of the concerned with character of society. Institutional ecology perspective allows the development of partisipatori of subjects in empowerment process. The research is qualitative study was conducted within the framework of post positivist paradigm. Approach that is used is phenomenology, intented capturing reality and meaning, and reveal that is behind the empowerment process to the people who affected communities of the cover-up were “Dolly” localization. The results of the analysis data expected to model empowerment to develop effective in the localization affected communities in particular.
Unduhan
Referensi
Bachtiar, R., dan E. Purnomo. 2007. Bisnis Prostitusi Profesi yang Menguntungkan. Yogyakarta: Pinus
Bronfenbrenner U. 1979. The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Bubolz, M. M., & Sontag, M. S. 1993. Human ecology theory. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 419-450). New York, NY, US: Plenum Press.
Cheung, C.K.; Chan, S.S.; Kwan, A.Y.; Ngan, R.M. 2005. Title Quality of Life in Older Adults: Benefits from Caring Services in Hong Kong. Source Social Indicators Research, Vol. 71, 29 1- 334
Creswell, J. W. 2010. Research design: pendekatan kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Yogjakarta: PT Pustaka Pelajar.
Fahrudin, A. (2011). Pemberdayaan Partisipasi dan Penguatan Kapasitas Masyarakat. Bandung : Humaniora.
Jönsson, Jessica H. 2010. Beyond empowerment : Changing local communities, International Social Work, 53 (3), pp. 393–406
Kasmel, A & Andersen, PT 2011, 'Measurement of Community Empowerment in Three Community Programs in Rapla, Estonia' International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 799-817
Kelly, R. F. 1987. Culture As Commodity: the Marketing of Cultural Objects and Cultural Experiences. Advances in Consumer Research Volume 14, Pages 347-351
Kuncoro. M. 2013. “Mudah Memahami dan menganalisis Indikator ekonomi”. Yogyakarta : UPP STIM YKPN.
Mardikanto, T., dan P. Soebianto. 2015. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat : Dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Mayer, Annette Braunack and Louise, Jennie 2008, The ethics of Community Empowerment: tensions in health promotion theory and practice, Promotion & Education, vol. 15, 3: pp. 5-8
Moleong, L. J. 2014, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, PT Remaja Rosdakarya,. Bandung.
Peraturan Daerah Kotamadya Daerah Tingkat II Surabaya Nomor 7 Tahun 1999 tentang larangan menggunakan bangunan/ tempat untuk perbuatan asusila serta pemikatan untuk melakukan perbuatan asusila, Pemerintah Kota Surabaya menutup lokalisasi di wilayah kota Surabaya
Prasojo, Eko 2013, People and Society Empowerment: Perspektif Membangun Partisipasi Publik,Resume hasil penelitian penulis dan tim Pusat Kajian Strategi Pembangunan Sosial dan Politik (PKSPSP) FISIP UI tahun 2003 dalam literatur research dengan judul “Pola dan Mekanisme Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di DKI Jakarta” di internet pada: http://ekoprasojo.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/PerspektifMembangun Partisi pasi-Publik.pdf
Reininger, Beilida; Martin, David W.; Ross, Michael; Sinicrope, Pamela Smith and Dinh-Zarr, Tho, 1999. Advancing The Theory and Measurement of Collective Empowerment: a Qualitative Study, Intl'L. Quarterly of Community Education, Vol. 25(3) 211-238, 2005-2006, Reprinted from: Int’l. Quarterly of Community Health Education, Vol. 19(4) 293-320, 1999-2000
Sjafari, A. 2010. Pemberdayaan Keluarga Miskin Melalui Pendekatan Kelompok, Jurnal Administrasi Publik, Volume 1 No 2
Soetomo. 2014. Masalah Sosial Dan Upaya Pemecahannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka. Pelajar.
Soetomo. 2011. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, Mungkinkah Muncul Antitesisnya?.Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar
Speer, Paul W. and Hughey, Joseph 1995. Community Organizing: An Ecological Route to Empowerment and Power. American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 23, No. 5, 1995: pp.729-748
Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung : Alfabeta
Suharto, E. 2010. Membangun Masyarakat Memberdayakan Rakyat. Bandung : Refika Aditama
Sumodiningrat, G. 2009. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Jakarta. PTGramedia Pustaka Utama
Sumpeno. W. 2011. Rencana Pembagunan Jangka Menengah Desa: PanduanPerenacanaan Berbasis Perdamaian. Banda Aceh: The World Bank.
Wrihatnolo, Randy R. dan Dwidjowijoto, Ryan Nugroho 2007, Manajemen Pemberdayaan: Sebuah Pengantar dan Panduan untuk Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, Jakarta, Elex Media Komputindo












