Security Sector Reform and Implementation of Good Governance: A Theoretical Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30649/aamama.v27i2.257Kata Kunci:
akuntabilitas, partisipasi publik, reformasi sektor keamanan, tata kelola, transparansiAbstrak
Reformasi Sektor Keamanan (SSR) sangat penting untuk memastikan stabilitas jangka panjang, khususnya di negara-negara pascakonflik dan yang sedang dalam masa transisi. Integrasi prinsip-prinsip tata kelola yang baik—seperti transparansi, akuntabilitas, supremasi hukum, dan partisipasi publik—memainkan peran kunci dalam keberhasilan upaya SSR. Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji bagaimana prinsip-prinsip tata kelola ini dapat secara efektif dimasukkan ke dalam proses SSR. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan penelitian kualitatif, studi ini menganalisis data sekunder, termasuk literatur dan studi kasus yang ada dari Sierra Leone, Afghanistan, dan Bosnia dan Herzegovina. Temuan penelitian menyoroti bahwa SSR lebih berhasil jika didorong secara lokal, disesuaikan dengan konteks politik dan budaya tertentu, dan didukung oleh lembaga tata kelola yang kuat. Di Sierra Leone, integrasi tata kelola yang baik sangat penting untuk keberhasilan reformasi, sementara di Afghanistan, tata kelola yang lemah dan perlawanan politik menghambat kemajuan SSR. Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa kepemilikan lokal, kemauan politik, dan kerangka kelembagaan yang kuat sangat penting untuk efektivitas SSR. Wawasan ini memberikan panduan yang berharga bagi para pembuat kebijakan dan aktor internasional yang terlibat dalam upaya SSR di masa mendatang.
Kata kunci: akuntabilitas, partisipasi publik, reformasi sektor keamanan, tata kelola, transparansi
Unduhan
Referensi
Aguja, M. J., & Born, H. (2016). Good Governance of the Security Sector in Southeast Asia: What Role for Parliament? DCAF.
Bryden, A., & Hänggi, H. (2005). Reforming and reconstructing the security sector. Security Governance in Post-Conflict Peacebuilding, 290, 23–43.
Cordesman, A. H. (2022). Afghanistan: The Uncertain Impact of a Year of Transition. JSTOR.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Deming, W. E. (2018). The new economics for industry, government, education. MIT press.
Donais, T. (2017). Engaging Non-State Security Providers: Whither the Rule of Law? Stability: International Journal of Security and Development, 6(1), 7.
Duffield, M. (2014). Global governance and the new wars: The merging of development and security. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Ekengren, M., & Simons, G. (2016). Conclusion: Challenges and Opportunities–Towards a Comprehensive EU SSR Policy and Practice. The Politics of Security Sector Reform, 305–320.
Gordon, E. (2014). Security sector reform, statebuilding and local ownership: Securing the state or its people? Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 8(2–3), 126–148.
HASSAN, O. (2023). Afghanistan: Lessons learnt from 20 years of supporting democracy development and security. Bruxelas, Bélgica: Directorate General for External Policies of the Union.
Jackson, P. (2018). Introduction: second-generation security sector reform. In Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding (Vol. 12, Issue 1, pp. 1–10). Taylor & Francis.
Jackson, P., & Albrecht, P. (2010). Security Sector Transformation in Sierra Leone 1997–2007. Palgrave, Basingstoke.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
Lauder, A. (2024). Legitimacy in conflict contexts: shifting rebel engagement in Sierra Leone and the presence of private contractors. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 1–33.
Mannitz, S. (2014). From paternalism to facilitation: SSR shortcomings and the potential of social anthropological perspectives. International Peacekeeping, 21(2), 269–285.
M’cleod, H., & Ganson, B. (2018). The underlying causes of fragility and instability in Sierra Leone. Commission on State Fragility, Growth and Development Case Study. London: London School of Economics and Oxford University.
Mietzner, M. (2022). Sources of resistance to democratic decline: Indonesian civil society and its trials. In Democratic Regressions in Asia (pp. 161–178). Routledge.
Morrice, A. (2015). Security sector reform trends: Conflict-affected states and international responses. Australian Civil-Military Centre.
North, D. C. (2018). Institutional change: a framework of analysis. In Social rules (pp. 189–201). Routledge.
OECD. (2008, February 25). The OECD DAC Handbook on Security System Reform. OECD. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/the-oecd-dac-handbook-on-security-system-reform_9789264027862-en
Qazizada, Y., & Wani, N. U. H. (2020). Terrorism as a Challenge to Good Governance in Afghanistan: An Evaluation. Kardan Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 1–13.
Sarjito, A., & Lelyana, N. (2024). Government Modernization and Challenges in Defense Policy Development. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies.
Schroeder, U. C., & Chappuis, F. (2014). New perspectives on security sector reform: The role of local agency and domestic politics. In International peacekeeping (Vol. 21, Issue 2, pp. 133–148). Taylor & Francis.
Schröer, A. (2014). Lessons learned? German security policy and the war in Afghanistan. German Politics, 23(1–2), 78–102.
Sedra, M. (2016). Security sector reform in conflict-affected countries: The evolution of a model. Routledge.
Shackelford, S. J., & Craig, A. N. (2014). Beyond the new digital divide: Analyzing the evolving role of national governments in internet governance and enhancing cybersecurity. Stan. J. Int’l L., 50, 119.
Stake, R. E. (2008). Qualitative case studies.
Visoka, G., & Aslan, E. (2021). Security sector reform and post conflict peacebuilding in Afghanistan.
Von Dyck, C. (2016). DDR and SSR in War-to-Peace Transition. Ubiquity Press.
Wonnawon, P. N. (2021). Comparative study of local ownership and democratic governance of security sector reform: The case of Liberia and Sierra Leone. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1), 1928388.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Aplikasi Administrasi: Media Analisa Masalah Administrasi
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
