PENGARUH MOTIVASI (KEBUTUHAN FISIOLOGIS, KEBUTUHAN RASA AMAN, KEBUTUHAN SOSIAL, KEBUTUHAN PENGHARGAAN, KEBUTUHAN AKTUALISASIDIRI) TERHADAP KINERJA PERAWAT ( Studi Kasus Di Instalasi Bedah Rumah Sakit Khatolik St. Vincentius A Paulo Surabaya )
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30649/aamama.v16i1.16Keywords:
physiological needs, needs a sense of security, social needs, the needs appreciation, self-actualization needs and PerformanceAbstract
This study aims to determine the effect of motivation on the performance of simultaneous installation of Surgical nurse at Catholic Hospital St. Vincentius A Paulo Surabaya. Population in this study is the installation of Surgical nurse Catholic Hospital St. Vincentius A Paulo Surabaya to 70 nurses, and technical pens gamhilan purposive sample sample (sample intended). While the technique of multiple linear regression analysis using the F test and t test, and the coefficient determenasi accompanied by classical assumption that is multikolinieritas and heterokedastisitas. Used to test the validity of Pearson product moment correlation technique, while primarily known for reliability alpha coefficient Cronbanch.From the results of research known independent variable physiological needs (XI), needs a sense of security (X2), social needs (X3), the needs appreciation (X4), and the need for self-actualization (X5) together - while providing a significant influence on employee performance (Y) as a bound variable. This can be found by comparing the Phming (59,688) with the level of offense (0,000), which is under the allowed error rate (0,05). Based on the calculation of the t test was performed to note that the independent variables partially significant effect on the dependent variable. It is known from the tfumng independent variable has a value greater than Z^/. Each regression coefficient independent variable is 0, 173 XI • 0.192 X2 i 0.193 X3 i 0.164 X4 V 0.186 X5 with the constant of 0.352 so that the resulting regression equation as follows :
Y= 0,352+ 0,173 XI+ 0,192X2 +0,193 X* +0,164 X4+0,186 X5 Variable needs a sense of security (X2) is the dominant influential variables on the performance of employees with a beta value of 0.281 size. Meanwhile, the value of R2 as large as 0.786, which means that the influential independent variables together - be as big as 78.6% on the dependent variable while the remaining 21.4% is influenced by other variables beyond the variables of the study.
Downloads
References
Amrirullah, SE, MM, 2002, Pengantar Manajemen Pertama, Cetakan Pertama, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.
As’ad, Moh, 2004, Psikologi Industri, Liberty, Yogyakarta.
Barney, Jay B and Ricky W Griffin, 1992, The Management Of Organization, Strategy, Structure, And Behavior, Hounghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
Bemardin, H. John and J. Russel, 1993, Human Resources Management, An Exeriental Approach, New York. Me Graw-Hill, Inc.
Cascio, wayne F, 1992, Managing Human Resources, Productivity, Ouatiry Work Of Life, Profits, Fourth Edition, New York : Me Graw-Hill, Inc.
Forsyth, Patrick, 1998, Memotivasi Karyawan, Terjemahan, Jakarta : Penerbit PT. Elex Media Komputindo, Kelompok Gramedia.
Gibson, L James, Ivancevich M, John, Donelly, 1997, Organisasi dan Manajemen : Perilaku, Struktur, Proses, Edisi Keempat, Terjemahan Jakarta : Erlangga.
Handoko, T. Hani, 2003. Manajemen, Edisi Kedua Yogyakarta, BPFE.
Hasibuan, H. Malayu S.P., 2003. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Revisi, Penerbit Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
Hersey, Paul and Kenneth H. Blanchard, 1993, Manajemen Perilaku Organisasi, Pemberdayaan Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Ketujuli, Terjemahan, Jakarta : Erlangga.
Koontz, Harold, Cyril, O’donnel, Heinz Wehrich, 1989, Manajemen, Jilid Satu, Edisi Pertama, Terjemahan, Jakarta : Penerbit, Erlangga.
Luthans, Fred, 1993, Organizational Behavior, Seventh Edition, New Jersey : Englewood Cliff: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Maholtra, 1999, Marketing Research, Prentice Hall, Inc. New Jersey, USA.
Mangkunegara, A.A. Anwar Prabu., 2001, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan, Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.
Moekijat., 1995, Manajemen Personalia Dan Sumber Daya Manusia, Bandung : Penerbit Cv. Mandar Maju.
Nawawi H. Hadari,1997. Ilmu Administrasi, Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia.
Pradan, Aswan, 1999, Pengaruh Faktor — Faktor Motivasi Terhada Kinerja Karyawan PT, Adtya Graha Surabaya, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Airlangga Surabaya.
Robbins, Stephen P , 1996, Organizational Behavior, Edisi Ketujuh, PT. Prentice Hall International Edition.
Siagian, S. P., 1995. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
Simamora, Henry, 1997, Manajemen Sumber daya Manusia, Edisi Pertama, Penerbit Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi YKPN, Yogyakarta.
Stoner, James, 1992, Manajemen, Edisi Ketiga. Terjemahan oleh Alfonso Sirait, Erlangga, Jakarta
Lieke,Rahma, 2006, Pengaruh Faktor - Faktor Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Pada Bagian Pemasaran PT. Panasonic Gobel Indonesia Cabang Surabaya, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Airlangga Surabaya
Sudjana, 1996, Metoda Statistika, Edisi Keenam, Bandung : Penerbit Tarsito.
Sugiyono, 2004, Metode Penelitian Bisnis , Cetakan Kedelapan, Bandung : CV. Alfabeta. Kumia, Wanodya, 2006, Pengaruh Faktor - Faktor Motivasi Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja
Karyawan PT. Pos Indonesia Surabaya, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Airlangga Surabaya.
Suryadi, Prawirosentono, 1999, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Kebijakan Kinerja, Edisi Pertama, Yogyakarta.
Winardi, 2004, Motivasi Dan Pemotivasi Dalam Manajemen, Edisi Pertama, Cetakan Ketiga, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta
