KUALITAS PELAYANAN PUBLIK PADA LAYANAN E-TILANG SURABAYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30649/aamama.v24i1.51Keywords:
Quality, e-traffic ticket, servicesAbstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the public service quality of e-traffic ticket in Surabaya. This E-ticket program was issued by District Attorney, due to the large number of complaints from the public regarding the less effective and efficient system. Therefore, the application of e-traffic ticket helps the community (the offender) in paying the fines. It will also facilitate data management of traffic violation cases for the police, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, and Attorney General's Office of Indonesia. This study uses a qualitative research method with a descriptive approach. The research data were obtained through interview, observation, documentation, and related triangulation in the administration of e-traffic ticket. The results show that the e- traffic ticket innovation is appropriate, good and profitable for the people in Surabaya, especially people enthusiasm who think positively and agree with this policy, but there are some difficulties experienced by the community due to lack of socialization from the authorities, but the solution is found as by the parties who issued this e-traffic ticket innovation so that the public will not be disappointed.
Downloads
References
Apriliana, L. Z. (2019). Efektivitas Penggunaan E–Tilang Terhadap Pelanggaran Lalu Lintas Di Polres Magelang. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 5(2). https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v5i2.17595
Arifin, M., Prasetya, K., Vivaldi, J., Sander, A., Khothimah, K., & Ardhana, R. (2020). Tingkat Kesadaran Masyarakat Terhadap Penerapan Sistem E-Tilang Kota Surabaya Mahasiwa Administrasi Negara, FISIP UPN “Veteran”Jawa Timur. 1–17. https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/osfosfxxx/6xdf8.htm
Chaerani Nur, N. (2021). Penerapan Aplikasi E-Tilang dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Lalu Lintas Jalan. Amsir Law Journal, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.36746/alj.v3i1.41
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain Riset (memilih diantara lima pendekatan). Penelitian Kualitatif.
Dahyar, D. (2019). Reformasi Birokrasi & Pelayanan Publik. Makassar: Leisyah, 254. https://id1lib.org/book/11116335/d0cafd
Dwiyanto, A. (2015). Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, Inkludif, dan Kolaborasi. UGM Press, 300. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=rrtjDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=pelayanan+publik+efektif&ots=CtCMyuo8Tm&sig=mI__DIE14yRwJrHllbuARsJYtDg
Erlianti, D. (2019). Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Administrasi Publik Dan Bisnis, 1(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.36917/japabis.v1i1.7
Hardiyansyah. (2018). Kualitas Pelayanan Publik - Konsep, Dimensi, Indikator, dan Implementasinya. Gava Media, 250. http://eprints.binadarma.ac.id/3820/
Indrajit, R. E. (2017). Electronic Government in Action: Strategi Impementasi di Berbagai Negara. Aptikom, 1(4).
Kamaruddin, S., H, J., & Ahmad, M. (2019). Strategi Dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik: Dimensi, Konsep, Indikator dan Implementasinya. ResearchGate, June, 168. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=U06rDwAAQBAJ&hl=id&sitesec=reviews%0D
Katharina, R., & Jaweng, R. N. E. (2020). Pelayanan Publik dan Pemerintahan Digital Indonesia. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Pelayanan_Publik_Pemerintahan_Digital_In/HVYrEAAAQBAJ?hl=id&gbpv=1&dq=teknologi+dan+informasi+pemerintahan&printsec=frontcover
Lestari, I. D., Wardani, D., & Wibawani, S. (2020). Inovasi Program Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement (E-Tle) Di Kota Surabaya. Public Administration Journal of Research, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.33005/paj.v2i2.54
Maghnun, I. A. M. (2018). E-Tilang Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Di Indonesia. Photosynthetica, 2(1), 1–13.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A method sourcebook. CA, US: Sage Publications.
Nikmah, K., Dominiqus, A., & Rodiana, A. (2019). Penetapan E-Tilang Dalam Situasi Perilaku Kedisiplinan Berlalu Lintas Masyarakat Surabaya. Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 2(2), 196. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhmo.v2i2.2381
Niswah, C. M. dan F. (2018). Analisis Kesiapan Inovasi E-Tilang Melalui Cameraclosed Circuit Television (Cctv) Di Kantor Kepolisian Resort Kota Besar Surabaya. Publika, 6(2). https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/27/article/view/22756
Nurany, F. (2018). Quality Analysis Of Surabaya City Police Metropolitan Services On Http :// Polrestabessurabaya . Com / Website Using Egovqual Method. Proceedings of the 2018 InCoPS, 209–213.
Ombudsman, A. (2020). ACT Ombudsman Annual Report 2018-19 | ACT Ombudsman. https://www.ombudsman.act.gov.au/reports/annual-reports/act-ombudsman-annual-report-2018-19#sec-4-3
Prabowo, E. N. (2019). Penerapan hukum terhadap e-tilang dalam upaya penertiban lalu lintas skripsi. 1(3). https://erepository.uwks.ac.id/4741/
Ratnawati, S. (2009). Model Pengembangan Sistem Pelayanan Dengan Menggunakan Citizen’S Charter Untuk Meningkatkan Pelayanan Yang Berbasis Masyarakat. Cakrawala. https://doi.org/10.32781/cakrawala.v4i1.113
Saputro, H. E. (2016). Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Profesional: Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Administrasi Publik, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.37676/professional.v2i1.163
Saputro, Y. (2021). Mekanisme E-Tle (Electronic Traffic Law Enforcement) Sebagai “Panopticon” Bagi Pengendara Kendaraan Bermotor Di Surabaya. https://repository.unair.ac.id/108923/
Suherman, D. (2020). Penyelenggaraan E-Goverment di Kabupaten Bandung Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Publica: Jurnal Pemikiran Administrasi Negara, 12(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpan.v12i2.10300
Wirtz, B. W., & Daiser, P. (2018). E-Government. Handbuch Staat, 981–995. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-20744-1_88
Wulandari, A. S. (2020). Inovasi penerapan sistem e-tilang di indonesia. Al-Mabsut, 14(1), 1–10. http://ejournal.iaingawi.ac.id/index.php/almabsut/article/view/393
Yusuf, I. M., Astuti, R. S., Kismartini, Afrizal, D., & Saputra, J. (2021). The Role of Collaborative E-Government in Surabaya Intelligent Traffic System: A Case Study of Surabaya, Indonesia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 2472–2479. http://ieomsociety.org/proceedings/2021rome/743.pdf
